The R. I. N. Strategy of Missions
This is the first of a three part series dealing with issues that directly impact the effectiveness of missions strategy by career missionaries, volunteers, and national partners. It is call the R. I. N. Strategy of Missions. R. I. N. stands for Reproducibility - Indigeneity - Non-Dependency. I hope what is expressed here will enable others to avoid many of the heartbreaking mistakes we on the field have made over the years. If you can pass an idea or strategy through this 3 phase filtering system without making any changes, then you have a greater chance of success. However, if an idea stops anywhere along the way, it would be better to stop and re-evaluate what you are going to do prior to implementation.
Several years ago at a Stateside Debriefing Conference I heard former IMB VP Dr. Don Kammerdiener state, "The sharper your vision, the more you will say no to." One of the greatest challenges for those involved in the missionary task is learning when and how to say no to good things and say yes to those strategies that will truly make an eternal difference. If we do not have a clear vision of what we are attempting to achieve, then saying yes or no really makes no difference. However, if our vision includes giving every person in our perople group, the opportunity to hear, understand, and respond to the Gospel, then our decisions become a matter of spiritual life and death for those who still have yet to believe.
Is it reproducible by others without outside assistance? This is a crucial question, especially the closer you get to evangelism, church planting, and discipleship. Actually, there are some strategies that it may not matter if it is reproducible or not. For example, we have used medical teams to open villages for church planting follow-up but we never intended these teams to be reproducible by our national partners. Also, many Gospel Saturaton projects may or may not need to be reproducible. So, how do you know if an idea or strategy needs to be reproducible. The really simple asnwer is, do you want others to do on their own what you have just modeled. If the answer is yes, then you need to be sure the entire process is reproducible. Here are two principles to help you ensure reproducibility.
Principle One: Do not do for others what they can and should do for themselves.
Principle Two: Train or teach others to do what they currently cannot do but should be able to do for themselves.
What most people do not realize is that sometimes even really good ideas can actually hinder the advancement of the Gospel to the frontiers of lostness simply because national believers are unable to reproduce the process that they saw modeled or the modeled is dependent on outside assistance. I am reminded of a request that Paul the missionary made in 2 Thessalonians 3:1; "Finally brethern, pray for us that the word of the Lord will spread rapidly and be glorified, just as it did also with you." We can pray for the rapid spread of the Gospel but this prayer must also be followed by actions that will accelerate the spread of the Gospel and not hinder its advancement.
There is a dark and ugly side of not following the principles of reproducibility. This is the underlying message we send when we do not model, train, and empower others in a way that they can then reproduce the same process and results. No one, of course, says these things outloud, but the message is still the same.
"You can't do what we can do."
"Even if you could do it, we can do it better."
"We are not sure that you are smart enough to learn how to do this."
Again, I have never heard anyone say this outloud and most folks would deny having thoughts anywhere close to these statements. However, as someone once wisely stated, "actions speak louder than words". And it is in our actions where we are found guilty.
So how do we avoid strategies that would lead us to implementing non-reproducible methodologies? Here are several ways to ensure reproducibility in your efforts. First, use the M.A.W.L. model as a framework for anything you want others to be able to do without you.
M.A.W.L -- Model Assist Watch & Leave
Model
by showing others how to do what you want them to do
Assist
by allowing them to do what you have modeled giving advice when needed
Watch
by observing them from a distance doing what you have modeled
Leave
them to do what they now can and should be doing without you
Model
by showing others how to do what you want them to do
Assist
by allowing them to do what you have modeled giving advice when needed
Watch
by observing them from a distance doing what you have modeled
Leave
them to do what they now can and should be doing without you
Another way to ensure reproducibility is to be ruthlessly critical of every aspect of your process. By this I mean constantly ask the question, can my people group do this, purchase this, make this, reproduce this without me or my resources? If your answer is ever no, they can't, then you have taken a step away from reproducibility. The problem for us is that even the smallest detail may not be a big deal for us but can mean everything to our people group in terms of their ability to reproduce what we have modeled.
I once had a missionary request addtional funds for training materials for his people group. I asked him what the materials were for. He responded that they were documents to assist them in church planting. Then I asked, if he, the missionary, was requesting funds, from where would the second generation church planters get their materials. There was a long silence. It became painfully clear that this process could not be reproduced by his people.
Then there was the missionary who arrived at training events a day early so that materials needed for the training could be purchased at local stores in the same location where the training would be held. Then when these materials were utilized in the workshop the missionary could tell participants where the item was purchased and the cost. Very reproducible.
Another principle to remember when thinking about reproducibility is, "Less is More and Simple is Better". What does someone need to know and have in hand to witness? How much does it cost to plant a church? How many study guides are needed to disciple someone? How we answer these and many other questions determines the level of reproducibility.
Americans like motivational quotes and stories that inspire us. I have heard many a strategy defended by quotes and stories such as these few examples:
1. Practice makes perfect.
WRONG!!! The "right" practice makes perfect. If you do something wrong over and over again you will become perfect at doing it wrong.
2. The seashore was covered with start fish. I came up on a man throwing them back in the water one at a time. I told the man that he would never get them all back in the water so why bother. What does it matter? Holding a starfish in his hand he looked at me and said, "it matters to this one".
Touching and heartwarming isn't it? But if our goal is to allow everyone an opportunity to hear, understand, and respond to the Gospel then non-reproducible models such as descibed in the story should not satisfy our desire to see more come into the Kingdom
3. If only one person comes to the Lord, then it was worth all the money and all the time invested.
This one makes my skin crawl. What we are doing is a matter of stewardship. If I could take that same amount of money and time and adjust the strategy so that it becomes reproducible and see 100 people saved, which is better? We have learn how to spiritualize our inability to do the right thing at the right time the right way.
It is not the missionary task to complete the task of total evangelization of a people group. The missionary task is to begin a process whereby local believers are taught how to be obedient to the commands of Christ and Scripture so that they continue to win their own people and then move out toward their Samaria, Judea, and the uttermost parts of the earth. As Steve Saint so aptly put it in his book, "The Great Omission", "The specific purpose of missions is to plant the church of Christ within every distinct people group on earth. It is then the responsibility of those churches to evangelize the rest of their group." For this to happen, our strategies for evangelization, church planting, and discipling new believers must be reproducible by those believers even after we are gone.
Is it reproducible by others without outside assistance? Remember, it's not about us!!
I once had a missionary request addtional funds for training materials for his people group. I asked him what the materials were for. He responded that they were documents to assist them in church planting. Then I asked, if he, the missionary, was requesting funds, from where would the second generation church planters get their materials. There was a long silence. It became painfully clear that this process could not be reproduced by his people.
Then there was the missionary who arrived at training events a day early so that materials needed for the training could be purchased at local stores in the same location where the training would be held. Then when these materials were utilized in the workshop the missionary could tell participants where the item was purchased and the cost. Very reproducible.
Another principle to remember when thinking about reproducibility is, "Less is More and Simple is Better". What does someone need to know and have in hand to witness? How much does it cost to plant a church? How many study guides are needed to disciple someone? How we answer these and many other questions determines the level of reproducibility.
Americans like motivational quotes and stories that inspire us. I have heard many a strategy defended by quotes and stories such as these few examples:
1. Practice makes perfect.
WRONG!!! The "right" practice makes perfect. If you do something wrong over and over again you will become perfect at doing it wrong.
2. The seashore was covered with start fish. I came up on a man throwing them back in the water one at a time. I told the man that he would never get them all back in the water so why bother. What does it matter? Holding a starfish in his hand he looked at me and said, "it matters to this one".
Touching and heartwarming isn't it? But if our goal is to allow everyone an opportunity to hear, understand, and respond to the Gospel then non-reproducible models such as descibed in the story should not satisfy our desire to see more come into the Kingdom
3. If only one person comes to the Lord, then it was worth all the money and all the time invested.
This one makes my skin crawl. What we are doing is a matter of stewardship. If I could take that same amount of money and time and adjust the strategy so that it becomes reproducible and see 100 people saved, which is better? We have learn how to spiritualize our inability to do the right thing at the right time the right way.
It is not the missionary task to complete the task of total evangelization of a people group. The missionary task is to begin a process whereby local believers are taught how to be obedient to the commands of Christ and Scripture so that they continue to win their own people and then move out toward their Samaria, Judea, and the uttermost parts of the earth. As Steve Saint so aptly put it in his book, "The Great Omission", "The specific purpose of missions is to plant the church of Christ within every distinct people group on earth. It is then the responsibility of those churches to evangelize the rest of their group." For this to happen, our strategies for evangelization, church planting, and discipling new believers must be reproducible by those believers even after we are gone.
Is it reproducible by others without outside assistance? Remember, it's not about us!!


8 Comments:
Reading your blog should be mandatory reading for all missionaries, seriously! You have a way of capturing key missiological principles and clarifying them in simple, understandable terms.
So many of us "think" we are doing things in a reproducible manner, but we are blinded by our own ignorance. In my own case I would rather be doing something (anything) that allows me to be active, than doing nothing at all. Reproducibility goes out the window as long as we are seeing activity going on in our midst. Many times these activities can be made reproducible and bear ongoing fruit if we will just do a little "tweaking." We need our leaders to hold us to the task by walking us through the RIN steps until we are able to do it on our own without supervision.
Ken,
Thanks for this post about reproducibility. I look forward to the other posts about the I. and the N. I am going to use some of your ideas, so I hope that is okay with you. Here are a few things to add to what you stated so well...
We have found that teaching to obey (which is training) should include on-going accountability and encouragement. Following our time for reporting and encouragement in a training session, we continue by modeling new teaching. Then we allow them to practice the new teaching with one another as we observe. We make corrections whenever we pick up on a malpractice. Then we give specific assignments based on the new teaching and what is happening in the trainee's current ministry. When they return for the next session, we repeat the whole process. We continue this until they produce new disciples and are repeating this same pattern for training with their disciples.
Each spiritual generation must be responsible for their own disciple's growth and reproduction. In other words, Paul is not allowed to teach Timothy's disciples, that is Timothy's job. We abort reproduction when we take over our disciple's job and do it for them.
Reproducibility is a very important topic in missions. I particularly like your instructions for vetting possible ministry options to see if they might lead to non-reproducible models. Unfortunately many involved in missions get preoccupied by either what they CAN do or what makes them feel good thus overlooking if these acts can be reproduced. If only more would actually think about the long term affects their actions have on the work we would have much healthier Christian work around the world.
One thing to think about in regards to all of the RIN principles. How can one know if their actions are Reproducible, Indigenous, and Non-Dependency without knowing the culture where he works? Knowing the environment where one works is essential to assuring that the work is reproducible. The modern day missions movement that emphasizes feeling good about yourself and immediate results often does not take the critical time involved in understanding the context in which the Gospel is being shared. The result of short-cuts to Biblical evangelism is a further syncretization of the Gospel.
It is very possible to be so caught up in seeking results that we can take shortcuts to see results. These may lead to immediate gratification but it doesn't lead to long-term growth. A question that I have found helpful in the vetting process is, "If we were not here, could the national brothers do this without me." The problem may be a financial one whereby the brothers could never afford my "ministry tools" or it could be a technological barrier whereby even if they had the money, they often would not know how to create professional presentations.
Great Blog!!!
The principle of reproducibility is generally valid and important. However, there is a possibility of going overboard on it, so that practically nothing is done. For example, the presence of foreign missionaries in and of itself, is not reproducible. Sometimes, we must do a few "non-reproducible" things to "get the ball rolling." I believe reproducibility is one factor we must look at as we ask the even more over-arching question of "What's it going to take to get the gospel to a particular people group, and see the greatest possible long-term results in the task of making disciples?" I would definitely agree with you, though, that the tendency is to err way too much on the side of "non-reproducibility".
I agree that not everything we do needs to be reproducible. This is why we need to ask the question. As David stated, missionary presence is not reproducible. Many of the volunteer teams are not reproducible. But that's okay. Jesus taught and gave His disciples models, authority, and empowered them to carry on the work. However, I don't remember reading about Jesus' "how to walk on water" workshop. It only needs to be reproducible if we want our local believers to be able to reproduce it without outside reources. Excellent comments by all. Let's keep these three topics on the front burner for a while.
George, welcome to the mix. You make some great points that we will continue to look at.
I am enjoying these posts concerning the RIN strategy for missions, and I believe they are on target. This comment is not as much a critique as much as it is a question to reconcile the RIN strategy with biblical theology. Since this post is several days old, this may be past the point of discussion, but here goes.
The age-old starfish illustration has been used for decades to spur people into involvement in "doing what they can to make a difference." Granted, such efforts and money may be better invested in a more efficient means for propagating the gospel and doing ministry, but this sounds strangely like the disciple's critique of the woman who poured her costly perfume on Jesus' head (Mark 14:3-9; Matt 26:6-13). The disciples called her act of love and gratitude "wasteful" because so much more ministry could be done with the money. Jesus' reply was that she had done a "good deed" and that "she has done what she could" (Mk 14:6, 8; Matt 26:10). Her act was out of love for her Savior, and that was commendable.
I don't have a good answer for this question, but "How do we encourage well-maining volunteers to improve their missionary methods while at the same time that 'your toil is not in vain in the Lord' (1 Cor 15:58)?"
Kevin,
It is never too late to discuss any time on this blog. I just do not know how many people will return to this post and comment section. I'll try to point folks this way.
I agree with you that when someone is giving their best and their all, then they are truly worshipping the Lord in their giving and service. I make a distinction between acts of direct worship to our Lord and worship that is in direct obedience to His commands. For example, along with your passage of the woman with the oil, you also have the widow's mite, and the Mary and Martha story that show us the importance of worship in it's purest sense. I did not mean to demean anyone's efforts when done from a pure heart. Let me try restating my position this way.
I believe that I am correct that in my study of the New Testament, God never gave a command to go without telling the listeners exactly what they were to do as they were going. Jesus never said, Go into the highways and byways and you know, just figure something out to do that tells people about Me. He was always ver specific. The wrong actions, no matter how well intentioned are still the wrong actions. For example, a volunteer is overheard promising a local national pastor that X amount of dollars every month to help he and his family to survive. The local missionary approaches this volunteer and states, you know, that is very kind, but what about all of the other pastors who need help. The volunteer responds, I can't pay all of them but I can make a difference in this man's life. On the surface, like the star fish story, this sounds admirable and at least something is being done. But what this volunteer does not realize is that his or her act of kindness may very well ostracise this man and his family from the rest of the community. The volunteer had no knowledge of the worldview element known as "leveling". Then, once his church finds out what is happening, they no longer feel responsibile to give sacrificially in order to support those who are ministering to them. Then at some point in time the money stops. Does this voluntee return to explain to this pastor and family why the funds have stopped? Probably not. What sounds like a good idea on the surface in the long run has a very negative impact on many lives. We are not judging the intent of what this person wanted to do, but somehow we have to find a way of saying there are some things that are just wrong, no matter how well intentioned they are.
By the way, we do tell volunteers how much they are needed and how important they are to global evangelization on a regular basis. We also tell them it is important that they "know" more about missions before they go.
If I come into your classroom during and exam and start helping people with answers, you are going to ask me to stop and probably insist that I leave the room. Do you not want to help your students make a good grade? Do you not care that they are under stress at that moment and I can help relieve some of that stress? I'm doing this because Jesus told me to. So, what gives you the right to ask me to stop? On the other hand if you taught me how to help these students prepare for a test, then you are taking my desire to serve and directing it to a more positive task.
I hope this helps. If not, keep pushing.
Great points all. Obviously you can't remove all ouside interaction but AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE we should limit our influence to things that we can reproduce in others. Our goal is to be careful in all outside influence. If the brothers rely upon the missionary's vehicle on every missions trip, the missionary's projector for a video, or the missionary's computer for everytime something needs to be printed then the missionary is nothing more than a taxi, equipment manager and a printer. We should probably call into question if the missionary is needed at all.
Too often the missionary is needed for his "things" and nothing else. Volunteers may well be doing the best they know but that doesn't mean that it is helpful. In the best case scenario, blitzing Guatemala City with english chick tracts would just litter the city with things that can't be read by the masses. In the worse case scenario, our subsidy and dependency driven ministries teach the brothers that it is not possible to do start new works without all of our tools.
Let's keep talking about this one.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home